Sharpton wants "scandal" protection

[nickg]

::)

http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/1/21/125546

""The next time anybody wants to know about Tawana Brawley, I'm going to ask them, 'Do you ask Teddy Kennedy about Chappaquiddick? Do you ask Hillary Clinton about her husband?'" the firebrand reverend complained to Newsday columnist Jimmy Breslin, while he was preparing for his Martin Luther King Day commemoration."

[Bassman]

Bless Sharpton.He's gonna play hell with the libbie Dems,and I fucking LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!
RUN AL RUN!!!
Imagine the spasms they're going into at the DNC. ;D

[Meshuga Mikey]

Bless Sharpton.He's gonna play hell with the libbie Dems,and I fucking LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!
RUN AL RUN!!!
Imagine the spasms they're going into at the DNC. ;D


center]http://people.delphiforums.com/artcruncher/Alsharptongue5.gif[/center]

[Bassman]

Bless Sharpton.He's gonna play hell with the libbie Dems,and I fucking LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!
RUN AL RUN!!!
Imagine the spasms they're going into at the DNC. ;D


center]http://people.delphiforums.com/artcruncher/Alsharptongue5.gif[/center]

Sharpton won't be bought off as easily as Hymietown Jesse was.
Say what you will about Al,but he's the real deal.He won't sit down and shut up for a speech at the DNC Nuremburg Rally in Boston.He's gonna push 'em even further outta orbit,or he's gonna make their lives hell.The libbie Dems may lose a big chunk of their automatic black vote to their own Perot.
Can't wait to see it. ;D

[nickg]

QUOTE FROM BASSMAN:
"The libbie Dems may lose a big chunk of their automatic black vote to their own Perot."

if al stays in the race all the way through, you are absolutely right. only this will end up burying the Dems and not the Republicans like it did with Klinton. i think a lot of conservative and independent votes went to perot which sealed it for billy boy. quite the opposite will happen this go round if al stays till the end, which will force the conservatives and independents NOT to cross lines and vote for ANY democrat.

of course this depends on the economy, the war on terror, etc. over the next 2 years. BUT with that being said and ALL things being equal, it could equate to a republican landslide a'la Reagan.

stay tuned.

[IM]

And if you think that he is going to push the libbies, you should fear what he could do if he sat beside GWB in a debate.

I mean the qoutes you got up there is to all the press, not just liberal press. I mean he said that for the benefit of conservatives who will want to run with Twanna Brawley too.

Just thnk about what he could say to that. Do youkeep asking GWB about his daughters DUI's? Or Do you kep asking GWB about his cocaine use?

And I wouold worry about GWB if I were you guys. The majority of the nation does not want to go to war against Iraq, but he keeps on ignoring us. His economic policy is a no show, but that doesn't seem to matter to you guys. He is trying to get a racist judge appointed to a federal bench, while at the same time standing up and opposing AA.

As the body count rises during the upcomng war, Bush's approval rating will start falling.

All of the above factors are the reasons I won't be voting for Bush. And the republican party will lose the 2 blacks they already have.

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

[IM]

So Bubba Louie has now entered the National Conservative name calling championships. I'm the self hating negro now huh. That's funny because I don't hate myself. But since I don't agree with lies, you seem to thnk so.

Just joking again jeremy?

This is why people get paid to be comedians. You however are an amateur. I would suggest that you continue making comedy a hobby and not quit your regular job.

Al Sharpton won't be the nominee. But if he were you would not want him to go up against GWB. That's becqause GWB would not be prepared to answer the challenge that Sharpton would present. He would have to answer questions he doesn't want to. He would have to explain things he has not expalained to any of us. GWB is not the brightest light. Rumsfeld, Carl Rowe and Dick Cheney are running this nation, not GWB.

So don't try telling me how this dumb ass would win in a landslide.

O I forgot, he lost the last eledtion, and somehow was given presidency. Perhaps he could manage again to get his brother to close a few pols in the black community, or try getting him to pass laws that don't allow votes to count by anyone who has a criminal record in florida.

If we go to war in Iraq without Bush presenting the evidence he said he would to the American people, as the body bag total increases, Bushes popularity will decrease.

So as you keep pushihg for war,, remember this, if this happens, the republicans can kiss the presidency goobye, and they can do the same for congress and the senate.

[Bassman]

And if you think that he is going to push the libbies, you should fear what he could do if he sat beside GWB in a debate.

I mean the qoutes you got up there is to all the press, not just liberal press. I mean he said that for the benefit of conservatives who will want to run with Twanna Brawley too.

Just thnk about what he could say to that. Do youkeep asking GWB about his daughters DUI's? Or Do you kep asking GWB about his cocaine use?

And I wouold worry about GWB if I were you guys. The majority of the nation does not want to go to war against Iraq, but he keeps on ignoring us. His economic policy is a no show, but that doesn't seem to matter to you guys. He is trying to get a racist judge appointed to a federal bench, while at the same time standing up and opposing AA.

As the body count rises during the upcomng war, Bush's approval rating will start falling.

All of the above factors are the reasons I won't be voting for Bush. And the republican party will lose the 2 blacks they already have.

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!


Sharpton will be kept outta debates-by the libbie Dems.They are scared to death of Sharpton,and one helluva lot more than GWB or Repubs ever will be.They know he will force the Dems hand.If Sharpton points out exactly what he Dems HAVEN'T done for blacks,which I venture he will,a lotta folks are gonna start saying...ya know,he's right.How come there AREN'T any blacks in leadership postions in the Dem Congress or Senate groups? HMMMMMMM...interesting.How come there's a Dem in a leadership postion who was a Klansman,and won't answer whether or not he saw a black man lynched? HMMMMMMMM....curious.
And that's just for starters.

[Bassman]

Bassman,

Thanks for stealing my thunder.

Bastard.

Thales

BOOOOOOOOOMMMMMM
Don't mention it! ;D ;D ;D

[Bassman]

http://democraticbuttons.freeservers.com/2004Dems2a-1x4_small.jpg

Brutha I.M. Nuts,

Tanks foe yoo vote foe pwesidant in '04. It be good to see that at lease one parson outsid'a Vermont voted foe me.

Keeps hope aliiiive!

Al

Tell ya one damn thing...I'd vote for him before Senator Grendel.
Hands down.

[IM]

Bassman,

Would you go tell that to someone who does't know this. You conservatives think that blacks just blindly flock to the democratic party because we are stupid enough to fall for the liberal lie. Yet you are to blind to see that there is no way in hell any black person should be standing up telling anyone else that they should be republican.

I have already said that neither the republican our democratic party has done much for blacks. In 1996 blacks help theri own poicitcal convention in St. Loiubs if the Ujamma Party. I don't know if it' s still around, but they held the convention at the TWA dome. The party was founded by Farrakhan, and that' s why it probably is not around anymore, there aren't many blacks who want the NOI in charge of the country.

We aren't so stupid as to elect racists into office then claim that the person is not a racist anymore after they have said serous raicst statments.

A black person would be a fool to join a party that bellieves what conservsatives believe in. And it's not about less government, because we have said for around 250 years that this government is wrong. What black person in their right mind would elect a president who wants to put racist judges in federal courts, then will argue against the constituitionality of AA and openly says that it should end even though AA was implemented because the supreme court supported it's constituonality.

Demoxcrats are at least fighting for AA, putting a puppet in a position is not evidence to support the fact that a party is srtanding for your best interest. What the elected officals fight for in the halls of congress is.

So go on and beliefe the spin on how Sharpton is going ot expose the dems for something. We already know what the right wing led conservative Republican party stands for. Trent Lott said it once, and GWB is saying it again.

[Bassman]

Bassman,

Would you go tell that to someone who does't know this. You conservatives think that blacks just blindly flock to the democratic party because we are stupid enough to fall for the liberal lie. Yet you are to blind to see that there is no way in hell any black person should be standing up telling anyone else that they should be republican.

I have already said that neither the republican our democratic party has done much for blacks. In 1996 blacks help theri own poicitcal convention in St. Loiubs if the Ujamma Party. I don't know if it' s still around, but they held the convention at the TWA dome. The party was founded by Farrakhan, and that' s why it probably is not around anymore, there aren't many blacks who want the NOI in charge of the country.

We aren't so stupid as to elect racists into office then claim that the person is not a racist anymore after they have said serous raicst statments.

A black person would be a fool to join a party that bellieves what conservsatives believe in. And it's not about less government, because we have said for around 250 years that this government is wrong. What black person in their right mind would elect a president who wants to put racist judges in federal courts, then will argue against the constituitionality of AA and openly says that it should end even though AA was implemented because the supreme court supported it's constituonality.

Demoxcrats are at least fighting for AA, putting a puppet in a position is not evidence to support the fact that a party is srtanding for your best interest. What the elected officals fight for in the halls of congress is.

So go on and beliefe the spin on how Sharpton is going ot expose the dems for something. We already know what the right wing led conservative Republican party stands for. Trent Lott said it once, and GWB is saying it again.

It's not spin.The Dems are scared to death of Sharpton.Why else have I read about Carol Mosley Braun contemplating running?
There's your token black Dem.She'll be a good candidate.Won't hear any criticism of Kennedy the Drowner or Byrd the Sheetwearer from her.She'll be the house servant to Sharpton's fieldhand.You watch.The Dems are gonna railroad Sharpton ANY WAY THEY CAN.And STILL you guys will whelp about Lott while ignoring what's REALLY important.Why wasn't a black man given Pelosi's job?Think about THAT next time you vote Dem.

I don't for a minute think you are stupid.Don't use a cop-out like that on me.

[wendy]

Damn Thales. You're really starting to grow on me. ;D

[wendy]

Like the hair that covers up your bald spot?


Don't you mean like the hair that covers your back and shoulders?

[wendy]

Too late. Most of the old newsmax crew has already seen my REAL picture. :P

[ALS]

Sharpton needs to form a new party. While we're at it, all lefty special interest groups need to form their own party. Especially since that's all the demwit party is comprised of.
The result of which will be conservative control forever!

it's happening folks

[Meshuga Mikey]

Bless Sharpton.He's gonna play hell with the libbie Dems,and I fucking LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!
RUN AL RUN!!!
Imagine the spasms they're going into at the DNC. ;D


center]http://people.delphiforums.com/artcruncher/Alsharptongue5.gif[/center]

Sharpton won't be bought off as easily as Hymietown Jesse was.
Say what you will about Al,but he's the real deal.He won't sit down and shut up for a speech at the DNC Nuremburg Rally in Boston.He's gonna push 'em even further outta orbit,or he's gonna make their lives hell.The libbie Dems may lose a big chunk of their automatic black vote to their own Perot.
Can't wait to see it. ;D


HE HE HE HE HE HE HEHEHEHE

De Lowd have Mysterious Ways of DOIN thangs hehehehe Usin a fat DO ragified chump like Revrunt Sharptomgue TO NAIL THE VISCIOUS LOW NEGRO TOLERANCE SOCIALIST BASTARDS TO THE NEXT DEMO PLATFORM -------FOR YO DINING AND DANCIN ON PLEASURE~!! HAHAHAHAHA

PEAS IN OURUH TIME~!!-PEAS IN OURUH TIME~!!-PEAS IN OURUH TIME~!!

http://people.delphiforums.com/artcruncher/NUKEMUMIANOW.gif PEAS IN OURUH TIME~!!-PEAS IN OURUH TIME~!!-PEAS IN OURUH TIME~!!

[ALS]

btw - what's with Al Gore and black nannies?? ;D

[Meshuga Mikey]

btw - what's with Al Gore and black nannies?? ;D


WHO HAVE BLACK NANNIES Not PUKON?


http://people.delphiforums.com/artcruncher/NUKEYUKONPUKE.gif

[ALS]

http://cyberkook.com/pics/girlwithoutfather.jpg

[IM]

Bassman,

I think you underestimate Mrs. Mosely-Braun.

Harold Ford, a black man from Tennessee ran for the office against Pelosi, and he lost in a close election. So a black man did run for election. You don't see any of that in the republican party. A lot of republicans dislike Powell,and they hated his stance for the continuance of AA.

Secondly, we see that the majority leader changfed inthe republican party due to Lotts racist comments, yet no woman was selected as a candidate, instead they selected another southern white man. I know that there are women in the republican party who are senators in D.C. and have been there longer than Frist.

You cannot expose somethng that is already known. All the Democratic Presidential candidates, except for Dean, Sharpton and Mosely -Braun are Democrats who are trying their hardest to sound republican. They fear Sharpton because he is going to go make them face up to the fact that they are selling out.

But to tell me that I copped out because I said what I said, is not right. Trent Lott said what he said, then GWB gave him an out he will use. The constitution. GWB is trying for a second time to get a judge on a federal bench who ha a racist backgrond. Pickering reduced sentances for KKK cross bunring assholes for christ sakes. Doesn't this show you guys anything? His oposition to AA included, GWB has shown his cards relative to what he feels about black people.

1 and zero are small numbers bassman, but I would rather have 1 than zero.

jeremy,

Do you know what Ujamma means?

And as far is it being twice as racist as the aryan party, well there you go once again trying to be a comic.

[Bassman]

Bassman,

I think you underestimate Mrs. Mosely-Braun.

Harold Ford, a black man from Tennessee ran for the office against Pelosi, and he lost in a close election. So a black man did run for election. You don't see any of that in the republican party. A lot of republicans dislike Powell,and they hated his stance for the continuance of AA.

Secondly, we see that the majority leader changfed inthe republican party due to Lotts racist comments, yet no woman was selected as a candidate, instead they selected another southern white man. I know that there are women in the republican party who are senators in D.C. and have been there longer than Frist.

You cannot expose somethng that is already known. All the Democratic Presidential candidates, except for Dean, Sharpton and Mosely -Braun are Democrats who are trying their hardest to sound republican. They fear Sharpton because he is going to go make them face up to the fact that they are selling out.

But to tell me that I copped out because I said what I said, is not right. Trent Lott said what he said, then GWB gave him an out he will use. The constitution. GWB is trying for a second time to get a judge on a federal bench who ha a racist backgrond. Pickering reduced sentances for KKK cross bunring assholes for christ sakes. Doesn't this show you guys anything? His oposition to AA included, GWB has shown his cards relative to what he feels about black people.

1 and zero are small numbers bassman, but I would rather have 1 than zero.

jeremy,

Do you know what Ujamma means?

And as far is it being twice as racist as the aryan party, well there you go once again trying to be a comic.


Ford RAN,but Ford LOST.A filthy rich white broad got the job.
I can just imagine the shreiks if the Repubs did the same-electing a filthy rich white broad over a black man.
A black man...a black man put forth by a Repub...wait a sec...you mean like a Supreme Court Justice?
Now,before you explode into the canned "Uncle Tom" response to avoid the fact that your Dem King kLinton didn't appoint a "Genuine" black to the SC...think about it.
You say Repubs hate Powell.What about the way you guys treat Thomas?

[Bassman]

Looks like the Dems have started the campaign to get Al outta the way...where was KKK Byrd?We all KNOW how much the Klan just LOOOOOOOOOOOOVES fire for intimidating blacks...
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apus_story.asp?category=1110&slug=Sharpton%20Fire

[IM]

Bassman,

There is a difference between the republicans and democrats. First of all, republicans are trying to end anything that has helped black people. Their leadership has been known to cater to racist groups, such as Lott and Bob Barr did.

The problem with Harold Ford was that he was running as a blue dog, conservative democrat. So then this would have meant that Ford was going to try to out republican the republicans, and that is no good.

Again, most blacks realize that neither party has done much for our interests. But the democrats just happen to have done a little bit, and the republicans have done nothing, and want to make excuses as to why they should do nothing.

Clarence Thomas is getting treated as he is because he is a hypocrite. You do not get admitted into one of the most prestigious law schools in the world because of AA, then 20 years later say that AA hurts those its intended to help. You do not get into one of the most prestigious law school sinthe world because of AA, then claim that you oppose the policy that allowed you to make the first step towards where you are today. If not for AA, Thomas would not have gone to Yale Law. Now he may have gotten into another law school, but it would have been Morehouse, Howard, Grambling, a historically black institution. And if that would have been the case, it is seriously doubtful that he would be a supreme court justice today.

So stop whing about how Thomas is getting treated by blacks, because he deserves what he is getting.. And if you want to talk about not appointing blacks to the SC, in reality BUSH SR. did not either. Clarence Thomas does not count.

Bassman, Clinton is gone. He is no longer president, He is old news.

But I will tell you that he did appoint the most racially and sexually diverse cabinet in Ameircan history. He started a comittee on race relations, he apologized to the experioments at Tuskeegee. These are things that Reagan or Bush Sr never did. Reagan was bold about his racism, and he did not care. Bush Sr. killed more civil rights than any president before him in modern times. He was going to get the voting rights act removed, but fortunately congress vorted to keep this.

You want to hate Clinton, fine. But don't try selliing bullshit to me, because I know the truth, and I do not fall for consevative or liberal spin.

[IM]

Thales,

Pluuueeeeeze!

One of my acquaintances is a republican senator in our state. In fact she is the Majority Leader. And I would vote for her any day. I would hope that she goes to Washington some day.

Unlike you, a person who will not see any ideas from democrarts as having validity. Only republican cold heart policies arewhat you stand for, even thought if they are implemented, you will suffer.

[Bassman]

Bassman,

There is a difference betweenthe republicans and democrtats. First of all, republicans are trying to end anything that has helped black people. Their leadership has been known to cater to racisat groups, such as Lott and Bob Barr did.

The problem with Harold Ford was that he was running as a blue dog, conservative democrat. So then this owuld have meant that Ford was goingto try to out republican the republicans, and that is no good.

Again, mostblacks realize that neither party has done much for our interests. But the democrats just happen to have done a little bit, and the republicasns have done nothing, and want to make excuses as to why they should do nothing.

Clarence Thomas is getting treated as he is because he is a hypocrite. You do not get admitted into one of the most prestigious law schools in the world because of AA, then 20 years later say that AA hurts those its intended to help. You do not get into one of the most prestigious law school sinthe world because of AA, then claim that you oppos eth epolcy that allowed you to make the first step towards where you are today. If not for AA, Thomas would not have gone to Yale Law. Now he may have gotten into another law school, but it would hav ebeen Morehouse, Howards, Grambling, a historically black institution. And if that would have been the case, it is seriously doubtful that he would be a supreme court justice today.

So stop whibng about how Thomas is getting treated by blacks, because he deserves what he is getting.. And if youwasnt to talk aboutnot appointing blacks to the SC, in reality BUSH SR. did not either. Clarence Thomas does not count.

Bassman, Clinton is gone. He is no longer president, He is old news.

But I will tell you that he did appoint the most racially and sexually diverse cabinet in Ameircan history. He started a comitteee on race relations, he apologized to the experioments at Tuskeegee. These are things that Reagan or Bush Sr never did. Reagan was bold about his racism, and he did nto care. Bush Sr,. killed more civil rights than any president before him in modern times. He was going to get the voting rights act removed, but fortunately congress vorted to keep this.

You want to hate Clinton, fine. But don't try selliing bullshit to me, because I know the truth, and I do not fall for consevative or liberal spin.






OK.If I call Sharpton "nigger",it's completely different than you guys calling Thomas Uncle Tom?Because I'm a white boy,it would be utterly unacceptable,but it's OK for blacks to rip Thomas.Right.
You amaze me.Bush 41 appointed Thomas.How the fuck does that not count?Thomas turned white since I last heard him speak?I may be nuts,but I ain't blind.
Ohhhh.....forgot.Thomas ain't "genuine",according to you guys,the self-appointed determiners of a black man's being "genuine".
kLinton is history.You're right.Hpwever,had he put a Lib black on the Supreme Court,you guys would be using that as a bludgeon against GWB when the next SC judge retires.
Instead of hiding behind the "kLinton hater" dodge,explain why our first Black President appointed rich whites.
If you can...

[IM]

So Clarence Thmoas is black, but Bill Clinton is not white, but black now.

What part of Clarence Thomas is a hypocrite do you not understand?

What part of Clarence Thomas was accepted into Yale because of AA do you not understand?

What part of the fact that Clarence Thomas opposes a policythat help him with the lie that it hurts those it's intended to help bullshit do you not understand?

I mean it is youguys who coonintue to determine that Jesse jackson is a race pimp, and that Clarence Thomas it a true black person, not me.

GWB is digging his own grave by fighting for Pickering. Libs don't have to do anything but let him do it.

I do not worry so much abnout who he ceremoially appointed to an office, but th epolicies he stands for and HIS actions.

Clinton showed that he was trying to be fair to people of all colors, not that he was trying to pander the the racists by trying twice to select a judge who is known for his racism.

Clinton is gone, and no amount of rhetoric is going to get me to even begin thinking about voting for GWB, or any current republican representative in Washington for re-election in my state. Now if my friend the majority leader I mentioned, I would vote for here anytime.

You guys wouldn't like her, because she is not far enough to the right for your tastes.

[arod]

What part of Clarence Thomas is a hypocrite do you not understand?

What part of Clarence Thomas was accepted into Yale because of AA do you not understand?

Thanks for asking. Here's the part I don't understand:


http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:uDh-srVEPKAC:www.forbes.com/forbes/97/1006/6007064a.htm+%22Clarence+Thomas%22+%22affirmative+ action%22+yale&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8

"In all the endless reiterations of this theme, no one has ever found it necessary to demonstrate that it was true. It so happens that affirmative action had not yet begun when Clarence Thomas entered Holy Cross College. Nor has anyone even considered it necessary to try to show that Thomas was admitted under the Yale Law School's affirmative action program, rather than by the regular admissions process.


It so happens that the same law school class that included Clarence Thomas also included Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham. Yet no one has ever questioned their credentials going in or coming out. Justice Thomas' credentials are questioned precisely because of affirmative action, even though his record may have been as good as;or better than;that of the current residents of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue."

[nickg]

QUOTE FROM IM:
"There is a difference between the republicans and democrats. First of all, republicans are trying to end anything that has helped black people. Their leadership has been known to cater to racist groups, such as Lott and Bob Barr did."

yeah right...that's why most of the anti-black "dixiecrats" were formerly associated with the democrats. do your homework.

and if you'll look at the civil rights act of 1964 it was the republicans who really pushed for it's approval. it was the staunch southern democrats (who still had dixiecrat blood running thru them) and the rich elite democrats (such as the kennedy type families) who stonewalled it for as long as they could.

jfk may have started the wheels turning for the civil rights act but he definitely was NOT overwhelmingly for it.

and lbj wasn't for it by any means but knew that approving it would add to whatever legacy he would have as a president, despite the vietnam quaqmire that would bring him down later.

and despite the continuing "camelot" imagery, rfk wasn't necessarily worrying about the plight of the negroe until his people told him he couldn't win the presidency in '68 without the black vote. then he decided to go full out for the black vote after the assassination of mlk. and i think he would have received the democrat nomination especially after winning in california the night he got killed.

so quit tooting the horn of the democrats and their love for the negroe plight when it isn't true by any means.

[IM]

Nickg,

I think that I know what the democrats were. And all of those dixiecrats are now republicans and they turned republican becaue they did not want integration. That's how mad they got. They changed parties and were accepted by Republicans.

Perhaps you need to do your homework.

It's funny how we are not supposeddto talk aboutthe past when I mention anything whites hav edone wrong,. But man oh man how wellwe can go back to the past to rtrey telling me how and why I should be a republican.

No thanks, I'm no fool.

I know about the Kenendy's. Father Joe who was the man who changed the rules fo the securities commission after he made his bankroll so that no one else could make money the same way he did.

For some reason or another JFK was welcomed by blacks. RFK worked for civil rights before 1968 fool. No white man could have gotten that kind of support during that time if they were doing nothing more than talking.

And I am not going to debate that with you, because I saw how things went down during that time. No white person, be it on the local level, state or federal, could have gotten any support from black people unless their actions spoke.

Let me make something clear to you. The only republican who has tried to do something for blacks was Arthur Fletcher. And he was not a president. No republican president in recent years, certainly not Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush 1 or 2 have done jack shit.

A little effort is beter than no effort.

So keep on trying to tell me how democrats ain't this or that. But while I know that democrats have done little, I also know that republicans have done less.

Nothing from nothing leaves nothing. And that's exactly what the republicans have done in my lifetime. A black person has got to be a fool to join a party full of people that think like some of you.

Ain't no fools round here!
arod,

What part about Clinton's npot being president anymore do you not understand?

Also what part about GWB getting admitted into Yale not by his grades, but because his daddy went there do you miss?

Clarence Thomas is irrelevant. I say he is stupid. You guys think he's great because he allows you to deny things. Whatever, go on and worship him. Build yourself a Clarence Thomas wing in your house. Make a bronze statue of the man you consider the great negro.

I think he is a hypocrite, and I think that he is nothing more than a puppet for the conservative faction more specifically the right wing. Bush did not want another Thurgood Marshall, and Clarence Thomas is nothing near the judge that man was. NOTHING, NADA, NO COMPARISON!

Most blacks don't like Clarence Thomas because we KNOW he is a hypocrite. But of course we all have to be wrong, because we just happen to disagree with your viewpoiint. And if we disagree then we have to be getting brainwashed by the race hustlers. And incidently there never are any white race hustlers in your world. No that race card is considered the truth by you dumb asses.

Yet you never have any proof to back up your bullshit. NEVER!

Even to coin such a term shows just how brainwashed you people really are. You will understand what I am talking about when your boy goes over to Iraq and starts fighting. All of you bomb such and such and so and so idiots will understand exactly what it is like for the entire world to hate our asses.

When we can no longer trade with anyone, when the entire world decides to sanction this nation, then you will understand that your dumb ass beliefs are wrong!

Don't think that it can't happen. We are not as needed as you dumb ass idiots want to believe.

So arod, why don't you ask yourself this question:

When did Thomas get admitted in Yale Law school?

And lest you forget, the current residents of 1600 Penn Ave are named Bush, and they are Republican.

[arod]

arod,

What part about Clinton's npot being president anymore do you not understand?

Also what part about GWB getting admitted into Yale not by his grades, but because his daddy went there do you miss?

I missed the part that relates to Clarence Thomas being accepted into Yale because of affirmative action.

Clarence Thomas is irrelevant.

How convenient, considering that it was YOU who brought him up, and who have seen fit to yet again expose yourself for the racist liar that you are.


Yet you never have any proof to back up your bullshit. NEVER!

Gee, I don't remember claiming Thomas was a beneficiary of AA.

So arod, why don't you ask yourself this question:

When did Thomas get admitted in Yale Law school?

Since he graduated in 1974, I would guess around 1970. So what?[/quote]

[IM]

arod,

You post up some mess from Forbes, a conservative magazine, and want someone to proove that Thomas went to Yale because of AA.

The we have a line about Bill & Hillary Clinton bieng admitted, but that has no releveance to any discussion on whether Thmas was admitted beause of AA.

He was admitted into Yale in 1970. I don't think Yale admitted too many blacks into their school before that time. I think Calvin Hill went there, or maybe he went to Columbia, I can't remember, but he was a football player. So if Thomas was admitted into Yale Law in 1970, and they were not known for admitting blacks before that time, then how do you think he was admitted, and why?

Furthermore Thomas has never denied these accusations. But of course this does not seem to fall in to what conservatives want to see.

And what exactly does Clarence Thomas have to do, with any disacussion of how Al Sharpton is going to fuck up your so-called liberals in the democratic party?

How does any discussion about Clarence Thomas make valid the claims of how a Sharpton run for presidency will make blacks see that the liberal democrats are worse than the current right wing led republican party?

Thomas was nothing but a nigger sex maniac who got his job because of AA......the man is sick .

[Meshuga Mikey]

IM,

Did you get your new avatar?

Here it is: http://www.sterlingtimes.co.uk/sambo6.jpg

Let me know if you like it.

Thales


YO YO YO YO YO YO YO YO



http://people.delphiforums.com/artcruncher/JeesehFaceAward.gif

[arod]

arod,

You post up some mess from Forbes, a conservative magazine, and want someone to proove that Thomas went to Yale because of AA.

Not just someone - the person who called him a hypocrite for his stance on AA.


The we have a line about Bill & Hillary Clinton bieng admitted, but that has no releveance to any discussion on whether Thmas was admitted beause of AA.

He was admitted into Yale in 1970. I don't think Yale admitted too many blacks into their school before that time.

Which means that you don't know.

I think Calvin Hill went there, or maybe he went to Columbia, I can't remember, but he was a football player. So if Thomas was admitted into Yale Law in 1970, and they were not known for admitting blacks before that time, then how do you think he was admitted, and why?

What I THINK has exactly as much value in the matter as what you THINK. Get back to me when you KNOW what the hell you're talking about.

Furthermore Thomas has never denied these accusations. But of course this does not seem to fall in to what conservatives want to see.

And what exactly does Clarence Thomas have to do, with any disacussion of how Al Sharpton is going to fuck up your so-called liberals in the democratic party?

I haven't the foggiest idea - but then I didn't bring him up.

[Meshuga Mikey]

http://people.delphiforums.com/artcruncher/Alsharptongue5.gif

[IM]

arod,

Nice try, but Thomas did go to Yale law as an AA baby. Everyone knows this, but only conservatives want to say that there is no proof. Thomas has never said he did not.

And it is hypocritical to benefit from a policy then say it hurts those it was intended to help.

[lgllady]

I had no idea that there were any people who did not know that Clarence Thomas went to Yale as an AA student! Colin Powell benefited from AA too.

They are both against AA now. Affirmative Action has long outlived its usefulness. Not that the program is incapable of helping disadvantaged students, it is still able to do that. What has changed is that equality of opportunity has become equality of outcome, and no input of quality from the AA beneficiary.

Sharpton will have to suffer the slings and arrows of Tuwanna Brawley for the rest of his life. Unlike anyone else his lies were directed to ruin the lives of very specific people, and done only because Al Sharpton is a racist and gets paid for being a racist and will always lie to promote racisim.

[jAfO]

arod,

Nice try, but Thomas did go to Yale law as an AA baby. Everyone knows this, but only conservatives want to say that there is no proof. Thomas has never said he did not.

And it is hypocritical to benefit from a policy then say it hurts those it was intended to help.




He benefitted from AA over thirty years ago, in case you haven't noticed things have changed since then. The need for AA then does not mean that it is still needed today.

You still need to prove that the majority of Blacks and Hispanics suffer from discrimination that keeps them from succeeding today.

[Flyrod]

I had no idea that there were any people who did not know that Clarence Thomas went to Yale as an AA student! Colin Powell benefited from AA too.
>>>Like you say they benefited from the temporary measure it was called at the time in it's defense!

They are both against AA now. Affirmative Action has long outlived its usefulness. Not that the program is incapable of helping disadvantaged students, it is still able to do that. What has changed is that equality of opportunity has become equality of outcome, and no input of quality from the AA beneficiary.
>>>Well ain't that the damn truth!!!!!!!!!!

Sharpton will have to suffer the slings and arrows of Tuwanna Brawley for the rest of his life. Unlike anyone else his lies were directed to ruin the lives of very specific people, and done only because Al Sharpton is a racist and gets paid for being a racist and will always lie to promote racisim.
>>>Sharpton is a racist by profession, and also a dumb shitt!!!!! Not sure about any academic traning whatsoever!!!!!

[IM]

All,

I think you had better post up a link where Powell said he was against AA. You see, at he last republican convention during his speech, he stated that he was for it, and that there still needed to be something to remedy continuing discrimination.

Of course that did not endear him to republicans, but he certainly earned my respect as a man who stands his ground even if his opinion is unpopular with the majority of those he is associateed with.

A black republican with a backbone. That is rare.

Jafo,

I think that I don't need to proove anything. Because the numbers I presented on the other page shows that even with decreased unemployment, blacks still had at least double the unemployment rate as whites. This should show anyone with just one braibn cell that discrinmination may just still be a factor that negatively impacts blacks and hispanics.

You cannot tell me that discrimination does not exist againast black people today. You seem to forget that I am black. The best thing you can do is what you have done, try telling me that you are not a racist, and that color doesn't matter to you. But as you do so, do not ignore the reality that not everyone is you or thinks like you.

LgLady,

Twanna Brawley will haunt Sharpton, on this I agree with you. But the biggest thing he has against him is NO experience in governing.

And try not to forget that Brawley came to him with a tear filled lie about some poloice brutalizing here. IN a cxity where blacks had been found in jail cells beaten, with the police saying they did it to themselves, a respponsible person could not ignore any story that involved police brutality.

Now he should have done a more detailed investigation of the validity of the story before he went of into court, and on screen complaining, but hopefully he learned from this mistake and will not do it again.

But as far as him getting paid for beiuung a racist, what's that you say about calling someone a racist because you can't accept the truth?

These are you own words LgLady.

Flyrod,

So anyone who complains about the wrongs committed by our government is a racist right?